Core overshoot and convection in δ Scuti and γ Doradus stars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of rotation on pulsation in δ Scuti and γ Doradus stars are poorly understood. Stars in this mass range span the transition from convective envelopes to convective cores, and realistic models of convection are thus a key part of understanding these stars. In this work, we use 2D asteroseismic modelling of 5 stars observed with the Kepler spacecraft to provide constraints on the age, mass, rotation rate, and convective core overshoot. We use Period04 to calculate the frequencies based on short cadence Kepler observations of five γ Doradus and δ Scuti stars. We fit these stars with rotating models calculated using MESA and adiabatic pulsation frequencies calculated with GYRE. Comparison of these models with the pulsation frequencies of three stars observed with Kepler allowed us to place constraints on the age, mass, and rotation rate of these stars. All frequencies not identified as possible combinations were compared to theoretical frequencies calculated using models including the effects of rotation and overshoot. The best fitting models for all five stars are slowly rotating at the best fitting age and have moderate convective core overshoot. In this work, we will discuss the results of the frequency extraction and fitting process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".