Knowledge of the effects of gestational alcohol consumption and FASD in an Ontarian sample
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current document is a two-paper manuscript-based thesis investigating what women in \nOntario know about drinking during the gestational period. Though there have been many studies \ninvestigating what women in various countries and locations know about drinking during \npregnancy, there is a lack of recent data focusing on Ontario, Canada. Both papers use a surveybased \napproach to answer the research questions posed in each respective manuscript. The first \npaper explored what women currently know about drinking during pregnancy and what \nindividual characteristics may influence endorsement of drinking behaviours. The majority of \nparticipants did not endorse drinking behaviours, however, a small but substantial portion of the \npopulation still endorses drinking. The second manuscript addressed where individuals receive \ntheir information about drinking during the gestational period. Results indicated that women in \nOntario saw information in print and news media, but would most prefer to get their information \nfrom health care professionals. Implications in terms of education and prevention are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".