Increasing HIV Treatment Optimism but No Changes in HIV Risk Behavior Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Vancouver, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To the Editors: BACKGROUND Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has dramatically reduced mortality among HIV-positive individuals and has been associated with declining HIV incidence.1–3 Numerous guidelines now recommend ART for all HIV-positive individuals, irrespective of CD4 counts.4–6 These approaches are supported by randomized trials demonstrating the benefits of early ART on improved clinical outcomes for HIV-positive individuals,7 as well as reductions in onward transmission.8 However, concerns remain that changes in HIV risk behavior could undermine “treatment as prevention” (TasP) effectiveness. Previous research studies have found associations between HIV sexual risk behavior and positive attitudes toward ART's preventive value,9 particularly among men who have sex with men (MSM).10,11 Most of this research pre-dates any formal adoption of TasP as policy, but relied on knowledge acquired from peers or health care providers. Several jurisdictions have recently adopted and are actively promoting TasP.12–14 In British Columbia (BC), Canada, TasP was introduced in 2010 through a pilot project in Vancouver and expanded province wide in 2012.15 Thus, MSM in Vancouver have been exposed to TasP messages for several years through clinicians, the media, and likely discussions with peers and community leaders.16 A previous cross-sectional analysis from our group demonstrated that indeed, higher HIV treatment optimism was associated with risky sex and that HIV-positive MSM had much higher HIV treatment optimism scores than those of HIV-negative/unknown MSM.17 To explore temporal changes in these relationships, we used data from the prospective cohort of the same study of Vancouver-based MSM to examine trends in attitudes regarding the benefits of ART and risky sex over a 3-year period, whereas TasP policy was actively implemented across BC. METHODS We enrolled sexually active MSM aged ≥16 years in a longitudinal study from February 2012 to February 2015, using respondent-driven sampling as a recruitment strategy.18 Enrollment of HIV-negative participants concluded in February 2014, but we continued to enroll HIV-positive participants for an additional year. Seed participants were recruited through community contacts, mobile phone applications, and websites catering to Vancouver-based MSM.19 After providing informed consent, participants completed a self-administered computer-based survey and nurse-administered clinical questionnaire. We collected sexual risk and drug using behaviors using a 6-month recall timeframe. The survey included the HIV treatment Optimism-Skepticism Scale (HOSS), a 12-item validated instrument for measuring attitudes toward HIV and ART.20 Higher HOSS scores indicate increased agreement with benefits of ART. Participants completed follow-up visits every 6 months using a modified version of the enrollment questionnaire. This analysis included data collected until August 31, 2015. The study received approval from the University of British Columbia, Simon Fraser University, and the University of Victoria. We performed descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses of data collected at enrollment, using Wilcoxon rank-sum and χ2 tests. We examined trends in HOSS scores, the proportions of participants reporting risky sex [defined as condomless anal sex (CAS) with a serodiscordant/unknown serostatus partner in the previous 6 months], and the proportions agreeing or strongly agreeing with a statement in the HOSS known as the TasP statement (“a person with an undetectable viral load cannot pass on the virus”) in each 6-month period using univariable generalized mixed-effect modeling. In these analyses, calendar time was used as a covariate. We used mixed-effects modeling to examine associations with risky sex and time, with separate models using the full HOSS scores or only TasP statement responses forced into separate models. Final models were determined using backward selection method, where variables with the highest type-III P value at each step were excluded until Akaike Information Criterion was minimized. All variables included in final models were checked for collinearity and interactions. All analyses were stratified based on self-reported HIV status and conducted using SAS (version 9.4; SAS Corporation Cary, NC). RESULTS We enrolled 774 participants in the cross-sectional survey; 556 (71.8%) self-reported as HIV negative/unknown and 218 (28.2%) as HIV positive. Of these, 181 (83.0%) were receiving ART at enrollment and 167 (92.3% of those on ART) had a VL <200 copies/mL. None of the HIV-negative participants were receiving pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) at enrollment, and only 8 reported using it by the end of follow-up. The median age was 34 years; 585 (75.6%) were identified as white, 74 (9.6%) Asian, 50 (6.5%) Aboriginal, 35 (4.5%) Latino, and 30 (3.9%) other. A total of 655 (85.6%) were identified as gay, 73 (9.4%) as bisexual, and 46 (5.9%) as other sexual orientations. Compared with HIV-negative/unknown participants, HIV-positive participants were more likely to be >40 years (74.5% vs. 21.6%; P < 0.001) and white (78.4% vs. 74.5%; P = 0.019) and report an income of ≥$30,000 CAD (28.0% vs. 41.0%; P = 0.001). HIV-positive participants reported more anal sex partners in the previous 6 months (median 4 vs. 3; P < 0.001), were less likely to report always using condoms during anal sex (33.5% vs. 64.0%; P < 0.001), and were more likely to report any risky sex (46.5% vs. 35.4%; P = 0.005). HIV-positive men had higher HOSS scores (median 28 vs. 24; P < 0.001) and were more likely to have heard of TasP (73.3% vs. 43.1%, P < 0.001) and to agree with the TasP statement (45.4% vs. 22.8%; P < 0.001). A total of 698 participants (90.2%) agreed to participate in the cohort study and 575 (82.4%) completed at least 1 follow-up visit. The median follow-up time was 1.98 years. Among HIV-positive participants, median HOSS scores increased over time (Fig. 1A), from 28 (Q1–Q3: 26–32) in July–December 2012 to 31 (Q1–Q3: 27–35) in January–June 2015 (test of trend P < 0.001). From periods 1–6, the proportions of HIV-positive participants agreeing with the TasP statement and reporting risky sex increased nonsignificantly from 46% to 55% (P = 0.111) and from 29% to 41% (P = 0.656), respectively. Among HIV-negative/unknown participants, HOSS scores also increased (Fig. 1B), from 24 (Q1–Q3: 20–26) to 26 (Q1–Q3: 24–29) in periods 1–6 (P < 0.001), as did TasP statement agreement (20%–36%, periods 1–6; P < 0.001). However, proportions of HIV-negative men reporting risky sex were unchanged (30% in period 1 and 27% in period 6; P = 0.104).FIGURE 1.: Trends in risky sex, HOSS scores and agreement with the TasP statement [“a person with an undetectable viral load (VL) cannot pass on the virus”], among study participants 2012–2015. A, Self-reported HIV-positive participants; (B) self-reported HIV-negative or unknown serostatus participants.In multivariate mixed-effects models, adjusted for age, income, partner number, sexual sensation seeking scores, substance use, and other HIV prevention behaviors, HOSS scores were associated with risky sex for HIV-positive (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 1.12) and for HIV-negative/unknown MSM (aOR = 1.03; 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.06). The TasP statement agreement was not associated with risky sex for either HIV-positive (aOR = 1.24; 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.81) or HIV-negative participants (aOR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.32) in adjusted models. DISCUSSION We observed increasing awareness regarding the preventive value of ART among HIV-negative MSM and increases in HOSS scores among both HIV-negative and HIV-positive MSM prospectively followed from July 2012 to June 2015 in Vancouver. These attitude changes occurred over a period when TasP was actively promoted by the BC Ministry of Health. However, we did not observe proportional changes in MSM reporting risky sex over the same period for either HIV-negative or HIV-positive men, suggesting that TasP promotion in BC is not undermining other HIV prevention measures, such as condom promotion. The TasP agreement was low (20%) among HIV-negative/unknown participants in 2012, but reached 43% by the second half of 2015, suggesting that diffusion of this knowledge among HIV-negative MSM is approaching that of HIV-positive MSM (54% in last period). This level of TasP agreement among HIV-positive MSM is similar to that recently reported in Australia (46.2%), using a slightly different TasP knowledge assessment,21 but much higher than was reported for HIV-negative MSM (10.0%). This study has a number of limitations. First, CAS with a serodiscordant/unknown serostatus partner may not be an accurate measure of risk behavior, given the increasing availability of PrEP for MSM in industrialized countries and that virologically suppressed HIV-positive individuals are very unlikely to transmit HIV.22 However, we have found that CAS with a known HIV-positive partner is associated with a greater incident HIV risk.23 Furthermore, there was no PrEP use reported at enrollment,24 and only 8 participants reported any use during follow-up,25 suggesting validity of this measure of risky sex in our setting. Second, our primary outcome measure of risky sex over a 6-month period did not include a frequency component. Last, individuals retained in the cohort may differ from those lost to follow-up, potentially affecting trends we did or did not observe. In conclusion, we found proportional increases of HIV-positive and HIV-negative MSM in Vancouver reporting agreement with the preventive benefit of ART over time, during a timeframe when TasP policy was actively implemented. We found no proportional changes of MSM reporting sexual acts putting them at risk of transmitting or acquiring HIV during the same period. This study offers some reassurance that risk compensation may not inevitably occur as TasP is promoted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".