“L’azzurro color di lontananza.” Infinità dello spazio e sublimità del pensiero nelle letterature moderne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recensioni / Book Reviews / Revues des Livres -246 -the plot moves away from the fulfilment of male desire.Kerr also documents the success of the Gelosi company-where Isabella and husband Francesco workedwith the participation of two Gelosi comedies, alongside the erudite comedy of the Sienese Intronati, at the wedding celebration of Duke Ferdinando de' Medici and Cristina of Lorena in 1589.After Isabella's untimely death in child's birth, her celebrity and star status was continued by her husband and son with an official funeral, commemorative coins and a posthumous edition of Isabella's Lettere, which contributed to her cult and worship.Kerr provides also quotes and translations from a lesser-known collection of stage dialogues (in form of love contrasti), likely written and performed during Andreini's years in the Gelosi, intriguing texts that show Isabella's incredible literary range.Kerr's analysis of such an early instance of celebrity culture makes The Rise of the Diva a very current book that has clout with the general public and with specialists alike.Buttressed by solid theoretical background and accurate scholarly research, enriched by translations of original texts, this book is an essential contribution on Andreini and the emergence of the professional actress in Italy and in the West.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".