MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2751629202 · doi:10.1021/acs.joc.7b02025

Phenoxazine: A Privileged Scaffold for Radical-Trapping Antioxidants

2017· article· en· W2751629202 on OpenAlexafffund
Luke A. Farmer, Evan A. Haidasz, Markus Grießer, Derek A. Pratt

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFree Radicals and Antioxidants
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsPhenoxazineChemistryReactivity (psychology)Atom (system on chip)AutoxidationPhotochemistryElectron transferMarcus theoryKineticsMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistryReaction rate constantPhenothiazine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diphenylamines are widely used to protect petroleum-derived products from autoxidation. Their efficacy as radical-trapping antioxidants (RTAs) relies on a balance of fast H-atom transfer kinetics and stability to one-electron oxidation by peroxidic species. Both H-atom transfer and one-electron oxidation are enhanced by substitution with electron-donating substituents, such as the S-atom in phenothiazines, another important class of RTA. Herein we report the results of our investigations of the RTA activity of the structurally related, but essentially ignored, phenoxazines. We find that the H-atom transfer reactivity of substituted phenoxazines follows an excellent Evans–Polanyi correlation spanning k inh = 4.5 × 10 6 M –1 s –1 and N–H BDE = 77.4 kcal mol –1 for 3-CN,7-NO 2 -phenoxazine to k inh = 6.6 × 10 8 M –1 s –1 and N–H BDE = 71.8 kcal mol –1 for 3,7-(OMe) 2 -phenoxazine (37 °C). The reactivity of the latter compound is the greatest of any RTA ever reported and is likely to represent a reaction without an enthalpic barrier since log A for this reaction is likely ∼8.5. The very high reactivity of most of the phenoxazines studied required the determination of their kinetic parameters by inhibited autoxidations in the presence of a very strong H-bonding cosolvent (DMSO), which slowed the observed rates by up to 2 orders of magnitude by dynamically reducing the equilibrium concentration of (free) phenoxazine as an H-atom donor. Despite their remarkably high reactivity toward peroxyl radicals, the phenoxazines were found to be comparatively stable to one-electron oxidation relative to diphenylamines and phenothiazines ( E ° ranging from 0.59 to 1.38 V vs NHE). Thus, phenoxazines with comparable oxidative stability to commonly used diphenylamine and phenothiazine RTAs had significantly greater reactivity (by up to 2 orders of magnitude). Computations suggest that this remarkable balance in H-atom transfer kinetics and stability to one-electron oxidation results from the ability of the bridging oxygen atom in phenoxazine to serve as both a π-electron donor to stabilize the aminyl radical and σ-electron acceptor to destabilize the aminyl radical cation. Perhaps most excitingly, phenoxazines have “non-classical” RTA activity, where they trap >2 peroxyl radicals each, at ambient temperatures .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicFree Radicals and AntioxidantsFrench-language works237,207