Phenoxazine: A Privileged Scaffold for Radical-Trapping Antioxidants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diphenylamines are widely used to protect petroleum-derived products from autoxidation. Their efficacy as radical-trapping antioxidants (RTAs) relies on a balance of fast H-atom transfer kinetics and stability to one-electron oxidation by peroxidic species. Both H-atom transfer and one-electron oxidation are enhanced by substitution with electron-donating substituents, such as the S-atom in phenothiazines, another important class of RTA. Herein we report the results of our investigations of the RTA activity of the structurally related, but essentially ignored, phenoxazines. We find that the H-atom transfer reactivity of substituted phenoxazines follows an excellent Evans–Polanyi correlation spanning k inh = 4.5 × 10 6 M –1 s –1 and N–H BDE = 77.4 kcal mol –1 for 3-CN,7-NO 2 -phenoxazine to k inh = 6.6 × 10 8 M –1 s –1 and N–H BDE = 71.8 kcal mol –1 for 3,7-(OMe) 2 -phenoxazine (37 °C). The reactivity of the latter compound is the greatest of any RTA ever reported and is likely to represent a reaction without an enthalpic barrier since log A for this reaction is likely ∼8.5. The very high reactivity of most of the phenoxazines studied required the determination of their kinetic parameters by inhibited autoxidations in the presence of a very strong H-bonding cosolvent (DMSO), which slowed the observed rates by up to 2 orders of magnitude by dynamically reducing the equilibrium concentration of (free) phenoxazine as an H-atom donor. Despite their remarkably high reactivity toward peroxyl radicals, the phenoxazines were found to be comparatively stable to one-electron oxidation relative to diphenylamines and phenothiazines ( E ° ranging from 0.59 to 1.38 V vs NHE). Thus, phenoxazines with comparable oxidative stability to commonly used diphenylamine and phenothiazine RTAs had significantly greater reactivity (by up to 2 orders of magnitude). Computations suggest that this remarkable balance in H-atom transfer kinetics and stability to one-electron oxidation results from the ability of the bridging oxygen atom in phenoxazine to serve as both a π-electron donor to stabilize the aminyl radical and σ-electron acceptor to destabilize the aminyl radical cation. Perhaps most excitingly, phenoxazines have “non-classical” RTA activity, where they trap >2 peroxyl radicals each, at ambient temperatures .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".