MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2751671051 · doi:10.3846/enviro.2017.146

Investigation and comparison of tires perfomance on ice

2017· article· en· W2751671051 on OpenAlexaff
Andrius Ružinskas, Henrikas Sivilevičius

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWinter Sports Injuries and Performance
Canadian institutionsTransport Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTreadSlip (aerodynamics)Slip angleNatural rubberRoad surfaceTire balanceFrictional coefficientEnvironmental scienceCoefficient of frictionMaterials scienceContact patchAutomotive engineeringSlip ratioStructural engineeringMarine engineeringEngineeringAerospace engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The risk of accident increases significantly when tire rolls on ice comparing to the dry surface. The vehicle tire becomes the main component of force transmission to the road and necessity of investigating the tire behavior becomes of high importance. This paper presents results of tire force transmission measurement with two different winter tires at the same operating conditions. Longitudinal and lateral force coefficient characteristics as the functions of slip ratio and slip angle are presented and discussed. The results showed a different lateral and longitudinal performance because of different tread pattern and rubber compound.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental engineeringSame topicWinter Sports Injuries and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207