MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Neuromuscular Consequences of Diabetic Neuropathy: Motor Unit Loss, Transmission Instability, and Alterations in Muscle Form and Function (P6.252)

2016· article· en· W2751734984 on OpenAlexaff
Matti D. Allen, Timothy J. Doherty, Charles L. Rice, Kurt Kimpinski

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsUniversity HospitalWestern UniversityQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMotor unitNeuromuscular transmissionMedicinePostural instabilityMotor functionPhysical medicine and rehabilitationNeuroscienceTransmission (telecommunications)AnatomyInternal medicinePsychologyDiseaseComputer scienceParkinson's disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To investigate how diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) impacts the neuromuscular system in humans using a comprehensive and novel array of complementary measures. Background: The early stages of DPN typically result in length-dependent sensory impairments, but can eventually lead to dysfunction of the neuromuscular system. However, these DPN-associated neuromuscular deficits are studied less often and are more poorly understood. Our laboratory has undertaken a set of interrelated investigations using decomposition enhanced quantitative electromyography (DQEMG), dynamometry, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to examine neuromuscular alterations in patients with severe DPN. Design/Methods: Patients with DPN (n = 12) were compared with age- and sex-matched controls (n = 12). Neuromuscular parameters related to the tibialis anterior (TA) and dorsiflexion were examined. DQEMG was used to derive: motor unit number estimates (MUNE), standard needle EMG parameters, and measures of neuromuscular transmission stability (e.g. jiggle, jitter, [percnt] blocking). Dynamometry and electrical stimulation were used to assess: contractile speed, muscle strength and endurance during a sustained isometric fatiguing task. MRI provided assessment of muscle quantity and quality. Associations between variables of interest (e.g. MUNE and muscle strength) were examined. Results: Patients with DPN were weaker (-35[percnt]), slower (-45[percnt]) and more easily fatigued (-21[percnt]) than controls (p<0.05). The DPN group featured fewer motor units (-45[percnt]), and reduced neuromuscular transmission stability (-30[percnt]; p<0.05). Patients with DPN were still weaker when strength was normalized to TA total cross sectional area (-30[percnt]; p<0.05). In the DPN patient group, TA MUNEs were negatively related to [percnt] noncontractile tissue (p<0.05; r = 0.72), whereas no relationship was found between these variables in controls (p>0.05). Conclusions: DPN may result in major changes to the neuromuscular system beyond weakness and muscle atrophy. Combined with sensory deficits, these changes likely contribute to decreased functional capacity and impaired mobility in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology→Same topicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery→French-language works237,207→