MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2751764087 · doi:10.25038/am.v0i3.37

Benjaminov ormar: Autobiografski diskurs u/kroz teoriju / Benjamin’s Closet: Autobiographical Discourse In/Through Theory

2013· article· en· W2751764087 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Palašti

Bibliographic record

VenueAM Journal of Art and Media Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicWalter Benjamin Studies Compilation
Canadian institutionsEducation and Early Childhood Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClosetInterpretation (philosophy)BiographySociologyLiteratureEpistemologyPsychologyLinguisticsPhilosophyHistoryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this paper is to explore the autobiographical and theoretical forms of entry in Walter Benjamin’s essay Berlin childhood, and, on the other hand, to present a diverse/flexible/ hybrid theory by which is realized a meaningful framework of analysis. According to this, the contextual interpretation of the story The Sock is, in fact, an intertextual play between autobiography (text!) and theory (footnote!).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.012
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAM Journal of Art and Media StudiesSame topicWalter Benjamin Studies CompilationFrench-language works237,207