MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2751804009 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2017.2745454

On Linear Precoding for the Two-User MISO Broadcast Channel With Confidential Messages and Per-Antenna Constraints

2017· article· en· W2751804009 on OpenAlexafffund
Ayman Mostafa, Lutz Lampe

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPrecodingTransmitterComputer scienceSecure transmissionMaximizationChannel (broadcasting)Optimization problemMathematical optimizationArtificial noiseSecrecyTransmission (telecommunications)Multi-userZero-forcing precodingAntenna (radio)MIMOAlgorithmComputer networkMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the design of linear precoders for secure transmission in the two-user multiple-input single-output (MISO) broadcast channel with confidential messages (BC-CM). The transmitter has multiple antennas, and each user has a single receive antenna. Two independent messages are simultaneously transmitted, one intended for each user, and each message should be kept confidential from the other user. Assuming real-valued transmitted signals, we design the linear precoders subject to total and per-antenna average power constraints, and also subject to amplitude constraints. In both cases, we tackle the design problem via weighted secrecy sum rate maximization. The resulting problem, however, involves a fractional objective, making it nonconvex and difficult to solve. Nevertheless, we show that this difficult problem can be transformed into a more tractable problem, for which a solution can be obtained by an iterative search algorithm. In addition, we characterize a condition under which the obtained solution is guaranteed to be optimal. Furthermore, we show that the problem formulation and solution approach can be easily extended to handle the robust version of the design problem with uncertain channel information. We provide numerical examples to demonstrate the performance of the proposed precoder in terms of the achievable secrecy rate regions subject to the aforementioned constraints. We also demonstrate the performance of the robust precoder under different channel uncertainty levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Signal ProcessingSame topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207