Political Marketing in the Lack of Political Market
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Political marketing is an inter-disciplinary study. Goods which are produced in politics is a power. In marketing, power is presented in various classifications (promises) via politician signs (brand/mark) to political market. In a political market, the advertisement is considered as the basic element due to powerful controls dominating on public media is subjected to suspicion. As power realizing needs attention to internal funds of human experience, and individuals communicate through interchanging signs in harmful relationships, it is necessary to pay attention toward creation process and applying signs and meaning in every social relationship. The author believes that political marketing could result in a better choice merely in an abstract competitive market, while when there is no competitive market, marketing techniques makes a cheat on people. Therefore, how it is possible to prevent from tempting in a non-competitive market? The author believes that rival producers can prevent from marketing monopolized through focusing on the lifestyle of voters. This hypothesis will be tested in the realized sociology framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it