Disturbance Rejection in Multi-Rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using a Novel Rotor Geometry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a novel multi-rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). The UAV, or OmniCopter, has eight rotors: four lift rotors in the typical quadcopter layout and four thrust motors that are orthogonal to the lift rotors and arranged as two pairs of coaxial counter-rotating rotors. The OmniCopter layout allows the decoupling of translation and orientation that is found in traditional multi-rotor UAVs. The OmniCpoter is able to translate in the plane orthogonal to the lift rotors without having to first roll and/or pitch. Testing is undertaken to determine the OmniCopters ability to reject disturbances from gusting winds. The results show that the OmniCopter has better disturbance rejection abilities when compared to the traditional multi-rotor layout.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it