MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2752115781 · doi:10.1145/3106195.3106219

Product Line Engineering on the Right Side of the "V"

2017· article· en· W2752115781 on OpenAlexaff
Susan P. Gregg, Denise M. Albert, Paul Clements

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftware product lineProduct (mathematics)Computer scienceNew product developmentDomain engineeringProduct lineDomain (mathematical analysis)Product design specificationSoftware engineeringProduct engineeringSet (abstract data type)Process (computing)Service (business)Reliability engineeringSoftwareSystems engineeringProduct designSoftware developmentManufacturing engineeringEngineeringMathematicsComponent-based software engineeringBusinessProgramming languageMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Product line engineering (PLE) is well-known for the savings it brings to organizations. This paper shows how a very large, in-service systems and software product line is achieving PLE-based savings in their verification and validation phase of development. The paper addresses how to achieve the sharing across product variants while the products being tested are evolving over time. Additionally, we will give a pragmatic set of decision criteria to help answer the longstanding issue in PLE-based testing of whether to test on the domain side or the application (product) side of the product derivation process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Software Engineering MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207