MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2752115781 · doi:10.1145/3106195.3106219

Product Line Engineering on the Right Side of the "V"

2017· article· en· W2752115781 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftware product lineProduct (mathematics)Computer scienceNew product developmentDomain engineeringProduct lineDomain (mathematical analysis)Product design specificationSoftware engineeringProduct engineeringSet (abstract data type)Process (computing)Service (business)Reliability engineeringSoftwareSystems engineeringProduct designSoftware developmentManufacturing engineeringEngineeringMathematicsComponent-based software engineeringBusinessProgramming languageMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Product line engineering (PLE) is well-known for the savings it brings to organizations. This paper shows how a very large, in-service systems and software product line is achieving PLE-based savings in their verification and validation phase of development. The paper addresses how to achieve the sharing across product variants while the products being tested are evolving over time. Additionally, we will give a pragmatic set of decision criteria to help answer the longstanding issue in PLE-based testing of whether to test on the domain side or the application (product) side of the product derivation process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it