MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2752254399 · doi:10.1109/sampta.2017.8024457

Estimation of varying bandwidth from multiple level crossings of stochastic signals

2017· article· en· W2752254399 on OpenAlexaff
Dominik Rzepka, M. Pawlak, Marek Miśkowicz, Dariusz Kościelnik

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBandlimitingBandwidth (computing)Computer scienceConvolution (computer science)GaussianAlgorithmMathematicsMathematical optimizationFourier transformTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This papers examines the problem of a local bandwidth recovery for non-stationary stochastic signals when the only available information is given in terms of level crossings. The use of multiple level crossings is a fundamental paradigm for the recently investigated event-based sampling approach. In fact, level crossings allows us to exploit local signal properties and to avoid unnecessarily fast sampling when the local signal intensity is low. The paper proposes the least-square based method for the local intensity estimation from level crossings for the class of signals being the time-warped version of the stationary and bandlimited Gaussian processes. This result is then related to the concept of the local mean bandwidth and finally to the local power bandwidth. The smooth convolution estimate of the local intensity is proposed and its positivity corrected version is introduced. The latter is achieved by the truncation argument and next by the method of alternating projections onto convex sets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.264

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207