MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2752312877 · doi:10.5539/mas.v11n10p1

ANN Modelling of Propane-Powered 4-Stroke Spark Ignition Engine

2017· article· en· W2752312877 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jehad Yamin

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpark plugEquivalence ratioPropaneSPARK (programming language)Compression ratioIgnition systemSpark-ignition engineThermal efficiencyParametric statisticsAutomotive engineeringEquivalence (formal languages)Range (aeronautics)Computer scienceNuclear engineeringFour-stroke engineEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringThermodynamicsInternal combustion engineEngineeringMathematicsChemistryPhysicsCombustionStatisticsComposite materialCombustion chamber

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An ANN model was developed by the authors and tested against experimental data available for an engine as supplied in the manual by the manufacturers. The model was found to perform excellently well by showing similar trends of performance for this engine as well as other engines for which the necessary data was available. This model was then used to perform some parametric studies to improve the performance of an engine using LPG (mainly Propane C3H8) as a fuel. This paper presents discussion on some of the parameters that affect the engine’s thermal efficiency with suggestions to improve it. The effect of equivalence ratio, compression ratio and spark plug location at different speeds on the thermal efficiency have been studied. Based on the engine and the range of variables studied it was found that the best spark plug location was 0.395 for all equivalence ratios studied at CR = 9.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207