MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2752399022 · doi:10.1016/j.ancene.2017.09.001

The Working Group on the Anthropocene: Summary of evidence and interim recommendations

2017· article· en· W2752399022 on OpenAlexaff
Jan Zalasiewicz, Colin N. Waters, Colin Summerhayes, Alexander P. Wolfe, Anthony D. Barnosky, Alejandro Cearreta, Paul J. Crutzen, Erle C. Ellis, Ian J. Fairchild, Agnieszka Gałuszka, P. K. Haff, Irka Hajdas, Martin J. Head, Juliana A. Ivar do Sul, Catherine Jeandel, Reinhold Leinfelder, John McNeill, Cath Neal, Eric Odada, Наоми Орескес, Will Steffen, James P. M. Syvitski, Davor Vidas, Michael Wagreich, Mark Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropocene · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsBrock UniversityUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsAnthropoceneGlobal Boundary Stratotype Section and PointInterimGeologyStratotypePaleontologyEarth scienceGeographyArchaeologyBiostratigraphyStage (stratigraphy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.118
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.140
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1180.140
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.006
Bibliometrics0.0130.013
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0110.013
Open science0.0190.014
Research integrity0.0190.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations469
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAnthropoceneSame topicIsotope Analysis in EcologyFrench-language works237,207