Direct Synthesis of a Copper(II) N-Heterocyclic Carbene Complex in Air
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Copper N-heterocyclic carbene complexes (Cu-NHCs) are prevalent in the literature, and their stability and catalytic activity have been well characterized and established. In an overwhelming majority of the reported examples, copper is present as Cu(I), owing to the favorable soft–soft interaction. In contrast, there are very few reports of Cu-NHCs containing Cu(II). This can be explained by the unfavorable intermediate/hard–soft interaction between carbon and Cu(II). The syntheses of examples reported thus far require the exclusion of air and moisture and involve the use of NHC transfer reagents or the use of free NHCs. This results in tedious, multistep procedures, making their preparation more time consuming and costly. Herein we report the synthesis and characterization of two air- and moisture-stable Cu(II)-NHC complexes by direct combination of 1,3-bis(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)-1 H -imidazolium chloride with copper(II) hexafluorosilicate. Analysis by single-crystal X-ray diffraction revealed that the species could be isolated in both distorted-octahedral and distorted-square-pyramidal geometries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".