La formación de los terapeutas ocupacionales. Licenciatura virtual en Terapia Ocupacional (Universidad Nacional de Quilmes): una experiencia mediatizada por la nuevas tecnologías
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabajo presenta la experiencia de la Licenciatura Virtual en Terapia Ocupacional, desarrollada por la Universidad Nacional de Quilmes desde hace más de tres años. Comienza con una caracterización del impacto que han producido las Nuevas Tecnologías en el mundo y en las diferentes áreas. Se trata con mayor detenimiento su impacto en la educación , revisando autores e investigaciones sobre el tema. Luego se explica la oferta académica de la Licenciatura Virtual en Terapia Ocupacional. El Plan de Estudios y la modalidad de enseñanza. Analiza los resultados de esta experiencia. Por último, se plantean algunas reflexiones acerca del desafío educativo de la hora actual, las necesidades de formación de los terapeutas ocupacionales y el diseño de propuestas que construyan una relación dinámica entre la sociedad y currículo, a modo de articulaciones paradigmáticas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".