Technical and Economic Assessment of Ground Source Heat Pump Systems (GSHPs) in Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ground Source Heat Pump Systems (GSHPs) are one of the most promising clean and low-carbon source of geothermal renewable energy technologies for heating, ventilation and cooling of homes. Geothermal heat pump (GHP) technologies, referred to as GeoExchange, comprise ground-source and/or water-source heat pumps that use the constant temperature of the earth as the exchange medium instead of the outside air temperature. \n \nThis study is a technical and economic assessment of use of GSHPs to support the policy options for increasing the share of geothermal energy sources within the residential sector of Ontario. The study identifies the technical and economic barriers to the wide-spread adoption of ground source heat pumps in Ontario and is an assessment of the impacts of large-scale deployment of GSHPs on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. \n \nIn this study, I have established the basis for evaluating the cost and environmental benefits of GSHPs in Ontario. The results provide a sound economic and technical foundation for supporting investment decisions in favour of implementing GSHPs as a viable alternative to traditional heating, ventilation, air-conditioning systems (HVACs), specifically, natural gas use for space heating and hot water usage in buildings. \n \nThe study reveals that geothermal ground source heat pumps have a great potential to reduce GHG emissions for Ontario’s residential sector by a magnitude of 21.7 megatonnes (Mt) that will in turn reduce the overall emissions of Ontario by 13%. \n \nGSHPs are a cost-effective solution for implementation on a wide-scale. The economic analysis clearly indicates the horizontal ground source heat pump system (H.GSHPs) is a strong winner in multiple sensitivity analysis when considering different lifespans, discount factors, and base case scenario against comparative scenarios. The rankings of the twenty-seven (27) cities selected for this study identify that the GSHPs are more attractive compared to traditional HVACs from an investment point of view in cities of the southern and distinct region as compared to the northern regions because of low present value (PV) of costs. The PV compares the cash outflows based on the initial investment, operating costs, maintenance costs, and disposal costs in a project lifespan of 60 years that span life cycles of 20 – 30 years for GSHPs and 12 years for traditional HVAC applications. \n \nThis study has conducted a comprehensive technical and economic assessment for twenty-seven (27) cities in Ontario to address the geographic variation of benefits. While there is a variation across regions of Ontario – and this is based on weather, soil condition and level of energy use – the overall conclusion is a compelling case for GSHPs as a viable alternative to the use of natural gas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".