MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2752658132 · doi:10.5964/ejop.v13i3.1509

Psychology in the post-truth era

2017· editorial· en· W2752658132 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEurope’s Journal of Psychology · 2017
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology of Development and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité de GenèveWebster University
KeywordsDownloadLicenseCitationLibrary scienceAttributionPolitical scienceWorld Wide WebComputer sciencePsychologyLawSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Psychology in the Post-Truth Era Authors Vlad Petre Glăveanu Webster University Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract No abstract available. PDF HTML Article info Impact Citations How to Cite License Published at 31. August 2017 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v13i3.1509 Issue: Vol. 13 No. 3 (2017) Section: Editorial Share: Z Glăveanu, V. P. (2017). Psychology in the Post-Truth Era. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 13(3), 375-377. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v13i3.1509 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 International License. PlumX Dimensions Views: Total Abstract PDF HTML 961 484 363 114 Downloads: Download data is not yet available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0060.000
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it