MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2752733517

A Study based on the Various Components of Capital Structure of Banking Companies

2017· article· en· W2752733517 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBanking Sector Performance and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapital structureSyndicateEquity (law)BusinessDebtCost of capitalCapital (architecture)Financial systemFinancial capitalFinanceEconomicsProfit (economics)Microeconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As capital structure decision determines the overall cost of capital and eventually the market value of the firm. Capital structure mainly consists of debt, common stock and preferred stock that issued to finance the various long-term projects of the firm. The main objective of the study to examined various components of capital structure of banking companies. Data is collect from secondary sources. A summary of the descriptive statistics of the independent variables for ten Indian banking companies for a period of 10 years from 2006-07 to 2015-16. Four components are to be taken it include equity capital, reserves and surplus, net worth and total borrowings. The researcher find out those two industries, namely Indian Overseas Bank and Syndicate Bank are more consistent in terms of Reserves and Surplus during in the study period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it