MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2752754835 · doi:10.4000/dse.1369

L’intégration de la littératie volet oral dans des pratiques de classe au préscolaire et au primaire québécois en milieu défavorisé

2016· article· fr· W2752754835 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lizanne Lafontaine, Éric Morissette, Myriam Myriam, Villeneuve-Lapointe

Bibliographic record

VenueLes dossiers des sciences de l éducation · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Language Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous avons mené deux recherches-action-formations portant sur les pratiques de littératie volet oral de 22 enseignantes québécoises du préscolaire et du primaire de milieu défavorisé (élèves de 5 à 12 ans). Nous expliquons leur vision et leur compréhension de la littératie vue comme porte d’entrée efficace afin de motiver des enfants de milieu défavorisé à travailler l’oral. Nous montrerons également comment elles ont intégré l’oral à leurs pratiques quotidiennes et présentons brièvement les situations d’apprentissage et d’évaluation en littératie volet oral qu’elles ont conçues et expérimentées dans leurs classes. Finalement, nous faisons état du renouvellement de leurs pratiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.014
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes dossiers des sciences de l éducationSame topicFrench Language Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207