Engagement des managers intermédiaires dans une approche cognitive de la gouvernance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les derniers développements du champ de la gouvernance mettent l’accent sur l’engagement des managers intermédiaires (MI) comme source de performance. Pourtant, peu de travaux interrogent les modalités de gouvernance permettant d’obtenir cet engagement. Pour cela, nous adoptons dans ce papier l’approche cognitive de la gouvernance pour répondre à cet enjeu. Différents leviers de gouvernance appelés pratiques mobilisatrices sont testés à travers l’enquête REPONSE 2010-2011. Les résultats de notre étude empirique montrent que les pratiques incitatives (intéressement et participation) ainsi que les pratiques de partage de l’information et de prise de décisions exercent un impact positif sur l’engagement des MI dans une perspective cognitive de la gouvernance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it