MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2752960635 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04731

SFG Study of the Potential-Dependent Adsorption of the <i>p</i>-Toluenesulfonate Anion at an Activated Carbon/Propylene Carbonate Interface

2017· article· en· W2752960635 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth K. Humphreys, Michael T. L. Casford, Phoebe K. Allan, Clare P. Grey, Stuart M. Clarke

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
FundersFP7 Ideas: European Research Council
KeywordsPropylene carbonateAdsorptionChemistryCounterionInorganic chemistryCarbonateActivated carbonIonElectrochemistryIon exchangeSolventElectrodeOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sum frequency generation spectroscopy has been used to characterize the potential-dependent adsorption of the p -toluenesulfonate anion at the activated carbon/propylene carbonate interface of the commercial carbon YP50F. Spectra recorded from the interface between YP50F and a 1 M tetraethylammonium p -toluenesulfonate in propylene carbonate solution showed no ordered anion adsorption without an applied potential. In contrast, there is clear evidence of increasingly ordered anion adsorption with applied potential. Furthermore, there is evidence of hysteresis such that the anion remains adsorbed when the applied potential was decreased back to 0 V. Significant reversal of polarity was required before the anion signal was lost. Changes to the propylene carbonate solvent peaks during the electrochemical cycle were also observed. The data indicate that the positive electrode charges either via a counterion adsorption mechanism or via an ion-exchange mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207