MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2753174481 · doi:10.1109/tii.2017.2746761

A Dendritic Cell Immune System Inspired Scheme for Sensor Fault Detection and Isolation of Wind Turbines

2017· article· en· W2753174481 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArtificial Immune Systems Applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersQatar Foundation
KeywordsFault detection and isolationRedundancy (engineering)Wind powerComputer scienceTurbineIsolation (microbiology)Scheme (mathematics)Artificial immune systemEngineeringReal-time computingReliability engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a fault detection and isolation (FDI) methodology based on an immune system (IS) inspired mechanism known as the dendritic cell algorithm (DCA) is developed and implemented. Our proposed DCA-based FDI methodology is then applied to a well-known wind turbine test model. The proposed DCA-based scheme performs both detection as well as isolation of sensor faults given dual sensor redundancy, unlike other works in the literature that only address the fault detection problem and rely on analytical redundancy approach for accomplishing the fault isolation task. A nonparametric statistical comparison test is also performed to compare the performance of the DCA-based FDI scheme with another IS-based scheme known as the negative selection algorithm. Through extensive simulation case study scenarios the capabilities and performance of our proposed methodologies have been fully demonstrated and justified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it