Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a cloud environment, a scheduler assigns arriving tasks to one of many servers, with the goal of minimizing response times. There are two conventional approaches to cloud scheduling. The first is called the Join-the-Shortest-Queue (JSQ) algorithm, which directs an arriving task to the least loaded server. Despite its excellent delay performance, JSQ is throughput-limited, and thus doesn't scale well with the number of servers. The second is called the Power-of-d-choices (Pod) algorithm, which selects d servers at random and routes a task to the least loaded server of the d servers. Despite its scalability, Pod suffers from long tail response times. In this paper, a hybrid scheduling strategy is proposed, and it consists of a Pod scheduler and a throughput-limited helper. Hybrid scheduling takes the best of both worlds, enjoying scalability and low tail response times. In particular, hybrid scheduling has bounded maximum queue size in the large-system regime, which is in sharp contrast to the Pod scheduling whose maximum queue size is unbounded.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it