MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2753326104 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1155

The Pregnancy Vaccine Effectiveness Network (PREVENT): Establishing a Multi-Country Cohort to Estimate Vaccine Effectiveness (VE) against Hospitalized Influenza During Pregnancy

2017· article· en· W2753326104 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sarah Ball, Allison L. Naleway, Jeffrey C. Kwong, Annette K Reagan, Kimberley Simmonds, Becca Feldman, Eduardo Azziz‐Baumgartner, Brandy E Wyant, Nicola P. Klein, Deshayne B. Fell, Paul V. Effler, Stephanie Booth, Mark A. Katz, Fatimah S. Dawood, Patricia Shifflett, Michael L. Jackson, Sarah A. Buchan, Avram Levy, Steven J. Drews, Shikha Garg, Stephanie A. Irving, Margaret L. Russell, Edwin Lewis, Bradley Crane, Sharareh Modaressi, Matthew Slaughter, Kristin Goddard, Mark G. Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of CalgaryInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVaccinationPregnancyInfluenza vaccineIncidence (geometry)PopulationCohortInfluenza-like illnessPediatricsEnvironmental healthImmunologyInternal medicineVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pregnant women are at greater risk of complications from influenza (flu) infection than the general population. Although vaccination is an effective method to prevent influenza, the vaccine is underutilized during pregnancy. A challenge to maternal flu vaccination is the paucity of data about the effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) in preventing severe outcomes in pregnant women. To inform policy and address this knowledge gap, CDC developed a multi-country collaboration to investigate the preventive value of IIV during pregnancy during multiple flu seasons. We present the progress to date of this Network. PREVENT was established in April 2016 to: i) estimate incidence of influenza and vaccination rates; ii) describe epidemiologic characteristics associated with illness; and iii) estimate IIV effectiveness in preventing hospitalizations during pregnancy associated with RT PCR -confirmed influenza. We selected sites that could identify the population of women known to be pregnant during flu seasons and integrate their hospitalization data, clinical laboratory testing, and vaccination records. We will assess VE using the case test-negative control design and use meta-analyses to pool VE estimates across sites and account for significant differences. Primary analyses will be completed by August 2017. Seven sites in Australia, Canada, Israel, and the US were selected; a protocol and data dictionary were finalized. We identified 1,024 pregnant women hospitalized with acute respiratory illness and RT-PCR tested, during six influenza seasons (2010–11 through 2015–16). Of the qualifying women, 550 (54%) tested positive for flu. Positivity varied by site (range 41% (US)–61.8% (Ontario, CAN)), and vaccination coverage varied across sites and seasons (range 7.3% (Ontario, CAN)–46% (US)). Analyses will examine flu season characteristics, vaccination patterns, and clinical and birth outcomes related to respiratory illness during pregnancy and flu incidence. Laboratory-confirmed influenza hospitalization during pregnancy is a relatively low-frequency event. Pooling data across multiple sites offers a way to estimate VE against severe influenza outcomes in pregnant women that is informative to influenza vaccine policy. A. Naleway, MedImmune: Investigator, Research grant; Pfizer: Investigator, Research grant; Merck: Investigator, Grant recipient; N. P. Klein, GSK: Investigator, Research grant; sanofi pasteur: Investigator, Grant recipient; Merck & Co: Investigator, Grant recipient; MedImmune: Investigator, Grant recipient; Protein Science: Investigator, Research grant; Pfizer: Investigator, Grant recipient; S. Irving, Medimmune/AstraZeneca: Investigator, Research support

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207