Adaptive Neural Control of Nonlinear Systems With Unknown Control Directions and Input Dead-Zone
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an adaptive neural control approach for nonstrict-feedback nonlinear systems in presence of unmodeled dynamics, unknown control directions and input dead-zone nonlinearity. To handle the difficulty due to uncertain control directions, Nussbaum gain functions are applied. Based on the structural characteristic of radial basis function neural networks, a backstepping-based adaptive neural control algorithm is developed. The main contributions of this paper lie in the fact that a backstepping-based neural control algorithm is developed for nonstrict-feedback nonlinear systems with unmodeled dynamics, unknown control directions and actuator dead-zone, and the total number of adaptive laws is not greater than the order of control system. As a beneficial result, the controller is much easier to be implemented in practice with less computational burden. A simulation example is given to reveal the viability of the presented approach. It is demonstrated by both theoretical analysis and simulation study that the presented control strategy ensures the semiglobally uniform ultimate boundedness of all closed-loop system signals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it