MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2753371881 · doi:10.1183/20734735.009717

Clinical exercise testing: basic principles and practice

2017· editorial· en· W2753371881 on OpenAlexaff
Pierantonio Laveneziana, Susan Ward, J. Alberto Neder, Vitalii Poberezhets

Bibliographic record

VenueBreathe · 2017
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClinical PracticeMedical educationComputer sciencePsychologyMedicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ERS course on “Clinical exercise testing: basic principles and practice” was held in Rome, Italy, from February 23 to 24, 2017. This is the first time that the course has taken place as a 2-day basic course. Previously, a 3-day course had taken place six times. Overall, 94% of participants were satisfied and declared that they would change their daily practice after attending the course; some of them even felt confident to start practicing clinical exercise testing. This was a great success. Faculty and delegates of an @ERStalk course on clinical exercise testing describe their experiences <http://ow.ly/dPwB30dxr8v>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBreatheSame topicCardiovascular and exercise physiologyFrench-language works237,207