MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2753400107

Clinical Implications of HIV-1, HSV-2 Co-infection and Opportunities for Intervention

2012· dissertation· en· W2753400107 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Darrell H. S. Tan

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOntario HIV Treatment NetworkCanadian Foundation for AIDS Research
KeywordsHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Intervention (counseling)MedicineVirologyImmunologyNursing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HSV-2 may have adverse consequences in HIV. I evaluated the impact of HSV-2 co-infection on (highly active antiretroviral therapy)-untreated HIV infection in a systematic review of observational studies (study 1) and a retrospective cohort (study 2). I further evaluated whether HSV reactivation rates in co-infected persons differ by use of suppressive cART (study 3).\n\nStudy 1 found modest evidence that HSV-2 seropositivity may be associated with accelerated progression to opportunistic infection or clinical AIDS, but not with increased HIV viral load. Some evidence suggests that HSV-2 disease activity is associated with increased HIV viral load and decreased CD4 counts. Study 2 compared rates of CD4 count change by HSV-2 status (Focus HerpeSelect ELISA) among 218 patients with a past period of ART-untreated follow-up using mixed linear regression models. No significant difference in the rate of CD4 count change was observed in HSV-2 seropositives at +13.6 cells/mm3/year (p=0.12) in univariate analysis, and -4.5 cells/mm3/year (p=0.68) in analysis adjusted for sex, HSV-1, oral and genital HSV symptoms, immigrant status, and immigrant*time interaction. These findings support the need for carefully designed and executed studies of HSV-2 suppression as an adjunctive management strategy for HIV disease, but raise questions regarding the exact mechanism of negative synergy between these viruses and the relative importance of HSV-2 latency and replication in driving these effects.\n\nIn Study 3, 44 cART-naïve and 41 treated (HIV RNA<50 copies/mL) HIV+ adults with HSV-1 and/or 2 co-infection collected oral, genital and anal swabs daily for 28 days. Negative binomial models were used to quantify the relationship between cART and HSV shedding (Roche LightCycler HSV1/2). Overall HSV shedding was low, at a median (IQR) of 3.6% (0, 14.3%) of days. No relationship was seen between cART and HSV-1 or 2 shedding in univariate (RR=1.55, 95%CI=0.83,2.87) or multivariate analysis adjusted for sex, baseline CD4, recent immigrant status, and time since HIV diagnosis (aRR=1.05, 95%CI=0.43,2.58). Null results were also observed for HSV-1 and HSV-2 considered separately. That HSV shedding persists despite cART suggests that trials of anti-HSV drugs for improving HIV outcomes may be warranted in such patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.036
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.128
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0360.128
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments→French-language works237,207→