MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2753431918 · doi:10.1080/00036846.2017.1368997

An ex-post analysis of the CME Group’s solution to the 5-year gap issue

2017· article· en· W2753431918 on OpenAlexaff
Ramzi Ben‐Abdallah, Michèle Breton

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Economics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBanking stability, regulation, efficiency
Canadian institutionsHEC MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFutures contractTreasuryDeliverableBondMaturity (psychological)EconomicsGroup (periodic table)Financial economicsActuarial sciencePolitical scienceFinanceManagementPhysicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In early 2001, the US Department of the Treasury suspended the issuance of 30-year bonds, and then resumed issuing its long paper in early 2006. As a result, there was a 5-year gap in the baskets deliverable into US T-Bond futures contracts expiring before 2016. In 2013, the CME Group raised the issue that grades contending for cheapest-to-deliver status were becoming significantly isolated from the rest of the basket because of this maturity gap. The aim of this article is to provide an ex-post assessment of the approach chosen by the CME Group to address this so-called ‘5-year gap issue’ and to compare its efficiency with that of an alternative solution that was not considered at the time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied EconomicsSame topicBanking stability, regulation, efficiencyFrench-language works237,207