MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2753671867

Mapping the sexuality-health-technology nexus : an arts based exploration

2017· article· en· W2753671867 on OpenAlex
Adam Gaubinger

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSmith ScholarWorks (Smith College) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFocus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNexus (standard)Human sexualityThe artsComputer scienceSociologyVisual artsGender studiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis is housed under the Queer Men’s Desire and the Digital Life of HIV Prevention Technologies research project (P.I.s Rory Crath, PHD Smith College School for Social Work and Cristian Rangel, University of Toronto). The project investigates the meeting of digital social/sexual networking technologies and biomedical HIV prevention technologies in the lives of gay identifying men, and trans/men who have sex with men (hereafter, GM)—studying what types of sexual/sexual-health actors are created in this novel historical moment. The thesis contributes to the project by reinvigorating and piloting the arts based research methodology of body mapping, a promising methodological approach to understanding GM’s embodied experiences as they are shaped in a complex field of social forces, using theories of embodiment arising out of recent trans and queer of color scholarship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.244
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it