Identification of Causal Rare Variants in an Extended Pedigree with Obsessive-compulsive Disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a common, heritable and etiologically heterogeneous neuropsychiatric disorder. Despite twin and family studies supporting genetic determinants in OCD, the discovery of causal variants remains elusive. To identify causal variants, an extended pedigree consisting of multiple affected individuals with early-onset OCD was studied. Genome-wide linkage analysis was performed using both parametric and non-parametric approaches. Whole exome sequencing was conducted on two of the most distantly related affected individuals who shared a haplotype. Variants were filtered based on their presence in both individuals, rare frequency, and location within linkage regions. Genes previously implicated in OCD were also screened. Several putatively damaging low/rare frequency variants were identified in genes involved in immune function (TRAFD1) and glutamate pathways (DLG1, CPQ, SLC1A1). Our findings identified variants within genes/pathways known to be associated with OCD and demonstrated the ability of our methodology to identify rare variants in common complex diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".