DIFERENCIAIS SALARIAIS: EVIDÊNCIAS PARA OS EMIGRANTES DO AGRESTE PERNAMBUCANO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A reorganização espacial das atividades produtivas, sobretudo no interior dos estados brasileiros, faz crescer continuamente os questionamentos sobre como os fluxos migratórios podem acentuar ou atenuar as disparidades de renda e promover uma melhora no padrão de vida do trabalhador. Em vista de tal fato, o presente estudo objetiva analisar a relação entre duas variáveis – migração e diferenciais salariais – considerando aqueles trabalhadores que emigraram do Agreste de Pernambuco, mesorregião que constitui atualmente um importante APL têxtil e de confecções do Norte/Nordeste. Para tanto, foram estimadas equações mincerianas, por MQO e Efeitos Fixos, a partir da base de dados longitudinais da RAISMIGRA-Mte para o intervalo de1995 a2008. Os resultados apontaram que os trabalhadores que emigraram do Agreste Pernambucano obtiveram ganhos salariais, contudo tais ganhos se reduzem quando se incluem no modelo as características observáveis e não observáveis do trabalhador.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".