MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2754002525

Policy Review: Addressing the Complex Challenges of Regulating Biotherapeutics

2017· article· en· W2754002525 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
FengYun Li, Shalpinder Dhothar, Elena Fekete, Nishi H. Patel, Tiffany Dang, R. J. Varga, Syed Jafri, Neliza Mendoza, Siddhartha Goutam, Nilesh Sharma, Noshin Karim, Nicholas D'Aleo-Sotas, Christine Phan, James B. Johnston, David T. Nguyen, Nick Jette, Dan Ziemianowicz, Mayi Arcellana‐Panlilio

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of undergraduate research in Alberta · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Ethics and Regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationBusinessProduction (economics)Risk analysis (engineering)Distribution (mathematics)Political scienceEconomicsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advancing industry of biotherapeutics is providing the public with new promising and innovative drugs which may pose risks if their production, distribution, and marketing are not directly governed by legislation. Apart from international agreements, such as the Cartagena Protocol, there are no specific and direct laws or regulations governing manipulated cell-based therapeutics in Canada. The introduction of these laws and regulations in Canada will allow for the safe research and use of biotherapeutics in a proactive manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.063
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.180
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0630.180
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0050.009
Scholarly communication0.0180.008
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0350.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.429
GPT teacher head0.521
Teacher spread0.092 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of undergraduate research in AlbertaSame topicBiomedical Ethics and RegulationFrench-language works237,207