MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2754171816 · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.032708

Time-dependent spin-density-functional-theory description of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math>-He collisions

2017· article· lv· W2754171816 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew Baxter, Tom Kirchner, E. Engel

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. A/Physical review, A · 2017
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRange (aeronautics)Density functional theoryAtomic orbitalSpin (aerodynamics)Atomic physicsPhysicsIonizationElectronQuantum mechanicsIonThermodynamicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Theoretical total cross-section results for all ionization and capture processes in the ${\mathrm{He}}^{+}$-He collision system are presented in the approximate impact energy range of 10--1000 keV/amu. Calculations were performed within the framework of time-dependent spin-density functional theory. The Krieger-Li-Iafrate approximation was used to determine an accurate exchange-correlation potential in the exchange-only limit. The results of two models, one where electron translation factors in the orbitals used to calculate the potential are ignored and another where partial electron translation factors are included, are compared with available experimental data as well as a selection of previous theoretical calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. A/Physical review, ASame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207