Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current world order is under siege.While this may be a slight exaggeration, there are voices of discontent with the current international system, atop which sits the United Nations as its nucleus.For some, the international community is ill-equipped to address our most pressing challenges, notably the need to balance civil and human rights in an age of terrorism, fear, and division, and the need to protect refugees, who are the real victims of our collective inability to end war and violence.These pressing questions -and many others -are difficult problems for which no easy solution presents itself, but they all center on an important an overarching question: what kind of international community do we want?Like it or not, we live in interesting times, and for some, the current turmoil in the international system is evidence that existing structures have outlived their usefulness.There are some who would tell us, as they have always told us, that the international system is inherently weak, that the only assurance of wealth and survival is power.They would have us believe that the only currency in the international system is, and has always been, power.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".