Validation of an Agent-Based Microscopic Pedestrian Simulation Model at a Scramble Phase Signalized Intersection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, an agent-based pedestrian simulation model was developed at the University of British Columbia to model detailed pedestrian interactions. The model was originally calibrated and validated with video data, collected at a signalized intersection in Vancouver. However, it is important to investigate the applicability of the model in different walking environments. The main objective of this study was to assess the model performance in handling pedestrian interactions at a scramble phase signalized intersection in Oakland, California. The intersection had four conventional crosswalks in addition to two diagonal crosswalks, used during the scramble pedestrian phase. Model parameters were calibrated with a genetic algorithm, which aimed to minimize the location and speed error between simulated and actual trajectories, extracted from the video sequence through computer vision. Validation results showed that the model was capable of reproducing pedestrian trajectories with high accuracy in regard to average location and speed error. The average location error for 271 pedestrians considered in the validation was 0.49 m, while the average speed error was 0.04 m/s. Detailed analysis of crossing speed for both conventional and diagonal crossings was presented, and the ability of the model to produce the same speed distributions observed in actual data was confirmed. Furthermore, the ability of the model to reproduce five interactions that were frequently observed in the data was assessed. Results showed that the model was capable of reproducing the actual behavior taken by pedestrians during these interactions with high accuracy, from 80% to 100%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".