MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2754357985 · doi:10.4000/books.pubp.2720

Nommer les îles, dire l’archipel : les Antilles au croisement de la colonisation et de la pensée archipélique

2019· article· fr· W2754357985 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires Blaise-Pascal eBooks · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIsland Studies and Pacific Affairs
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ces noms que j’habite s’organisent en archipel. Édouard Glissant archipelago : fragments : a geological plate being crushed by the pacific’s curve, cracking open yucatan ; the arctic/north american monolith : hence cuba, hispaniola, puerto rico : continental outriders and the dust of the bahamas. atlantic africa pushing up the beaches of our eastern seawards.Edward Kamau Brathwaite La toponymie semble depuis toujours hanter la pensée antillaise, comme si les noms portaient en eux les traces d...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it