MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2754374178 · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.027

Whole-genome and Transcriptome Sequencing of Prostate Cancer Identify New Genetic Alterations Driving Disease Progression

2017· article· en· W2754374178 on OpenAlexaff
Shancheng Ren, Gong‐Hong Wei, Dongbing Liu, Liguo Wang, Yong Hou, Shida Zhu, Lihua Peng, Qin Zhang, Yanbing Cheng, Hong Su, Xiuqing Zhou, Jibin Zhang, Fuqiang Li, Hancheng Zheng, Zhikun Zhao, Changjun Yin, Zengquan He, Xīn Gào, Haiyen E. Zhau, Chia-Yi Chu, Boyang Jason Wu, Colin C. Collins, Stanislav Volik, Robert H. Bell, Jiaoti Huang, Kui Wu, Danfeng Xu, Dingwei Ye, Yongwei Yu, Lianhui Zhu, Meng Qiao, Hang-Mao Lee, Yuehong Yang, Yasheng Zhu, Xiaolei Shi, Rui Chen, Yang Wang, Weidong Xu, Yan‐Qiong Cheng, Chuanliang Xu, Xu Gao, Tie Zhou, Bo Yang, Jianguo Hou, Li Liu, Zhensheng Zhang, Yao Zhu, Chao Qin, Pengfei Shao, Jun Pang, Leland W.K. Chung, Jianfeng Xu, Chin‐Lee Wu, Weide Zhong, Xun Xu, Yingrui Li, Xiuqing Zhang, Jian Wang, Huanming Yang, Jun Wang, Haojie Huang, Yinghao Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Urology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTranscriptomeProstate cancerDiseaseGenomeWhole genome sequencingDNA sequencingCancerComputational biologyBioinformaticsGeneGeneticsInternal medicineGene expressionBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations200
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEuropean UrologySame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207