Children’s Preferences among Services and Amenities in Kids-Friendly Resorts: An Exploratory Study on American Tweens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tweens are consumers who make their own choices about what to purchase or consume. Similarly, they are tourists who have their own opinion about where to spend their vacation and what activities to practice during their leisure time. Kids-friendly resorts have emerged targeting mainly kids with their tourism product, services and amenities relying on the strong influence that children have on their families. Tweens are one of the important segments targeted by kids-friendly resorts as a core tourist segment. This study investigates the alignment between the services and amenities offered by the kids- friendly resorts and the actual needs and desires of tweens in USA. In addition, it highlights the services and amenities preferred the most and those preferred the least by those tweens. Furthermore, it examines whether there are differences among the tweens’ preferences regarding the services and amenities in kids-friendly resorts due to difference in age or gender. The study proves the compatibility between the services and amenities in kids-friendly resorts and the tweens’ preferences. It also reveals that there are no significant differences among the tweens’ preferences due to difference in age or gender.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".