MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2754477315 · doi:10.1002/uog.17978

OP30.01: Photoacoustics as a new imaging technique for <i>in utero</i> assessment of fetal cerebellar tissue oxygenation

2017· article· en· W2754477315 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Enrique Gil Guevara, Rommy Díaz, Marc Oria, Emrah Aydın, Soner Duru, José L. Peiró

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedizinische Universität WienUniversität Wien
KeywordsMedicineOxygenationFetusUltrasoundOxygen saturationNuclear medicineCerebellumOxygenBiomedical engineeringPregnancyAnesthesiaRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To assess the feasibility of evaluating the fetal cerebellar oxygenation in pregnant rats by Photoacoustics (PA) imaging on day 20 of pregnancy (E20). PA imaging is a real-time, non-invasive imaging method, combining laser pulse tissue excitation and ultrasonic detection of the tissue response. We conducted an experimental pilot study in four rat fetuses, from two different pregnant rats that were scanned transabdominally on E20 with a PA imaging system coupled to high-resolution ultrasound imaging. The Vevo 2100 and Vevo LAZR were used to first identify the fetal cerebellum and then assess its oxygen saturation. PA images were acquired with a 15 MHz probe connected to the Vevo LAZR PA imaging system (Fujifilm Visualsonics Inc, Toronto, Canada). The sO2 Av represents the average blood oxygen saturation, which is the sum of all oxygenated pixels in the region of interest, divided by the oxygenated and deoxygenated pixels. The sO2 Av in the cerebellum of the first two fetuses was 82.44% and 79.76%; and the sO2 Av 3D was 81.1% and 79.2%; and in the other two fetuses the sO2 Av was 78.59% and 74.72%; and the sO2 Av 3D was 80.89% and 78.82%. The observed range was 74.72% to 82.44% and the median was 79.48% with a SD of 2.31. Supporting information can be found in the online version of this abstract Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207