MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W275448548 · doi:10.3138/cjfs.14.1.5

Rhythms of Vision in Stan Brakhage’s <i>City Streaming</i>

2005· article· fr· W275448548 on OpenAlex
Marilyn Brakhage

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSpatial and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le « rêve de La Ville » est un thème qui réapparaît souvent dans l’oeuvre de Brakhage. City Streaming, tourné à Toronto en 1989, se distingue de ses autres films urbains par son élan festif. Libéré du « poids de l’histoire » et de la trop grande familiarité des lieux, que l’on retrouve par exemple dans The Dead et Unconscious London Strata, Brakhage peut présenter une construction dynamique de la ville en tant qu’entité vivante, en tant que réseau d’énergie exubérante et enthousiaste semblable au flot d’électricité qui parcourt le système nerveux humain. Les tensions concep - tuelles et formelles de l’oeuvre (par exemple, entre les prises de vue intérieures et extérieures, entre les lieux privés et publics), ainsi que l’ironie et l’humour visuel, situent l’individu (le cinéaste) en dehors de la « ruche » qu’il observe. Il peut ainsi se « re-mémorer » son expérience du lieu pendant qu’il « chante la chanson » de La Ville.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it