MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2754507699 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.04449

Directed migration of microscale swimmers by an array of shaped obstacles: modeling and shape optimization

2017· preprint· en· W2754507699 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jiajun Tong, Michael Shelley

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2017
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMicro and Nano Robotics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYork UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMicroscale chemistryCurvaturePosition (finance)RodMechanicsFlux (metallurgy)Boundary (topology)Biological systemComputer scienceGeometryMaterials sciencePhysicsMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Achieving macroscopic directed migration of microscale swimmers in a fluid is an important step towards utilizing their autonomous motion. It has been experimentally shown that directed motion can be induced, without any external fields, by certain geometrically asymmetric obstacles due to interaction between their boundaries and the swimmers. In this paper, we propose a kinetic-type model to study swimming and directional migration of microscale bimetallic rods in a periodic array of posts with non-circular cross-sections. Both rod position and orientation are taken into account; rod trapping and release on the post boundaries are modeled by empirically characterizing curvature and orientational dependence of the boundary absorption and desorption. Intensity of the directed rod migration, which we call the normalized net flux, is then defined and computed given the geometry of the post array. We numerically study the effect of post spacings on the flux; we also apply shape optimization to find better post shapes that can induce stronger flux. Inspired by preliminary numerical results on two candidate posts, we perform an approximate analysis on a simplified model to show the key geometric features a good post should have. Based on that, three new candidate shapes are proposed which give rise to large fluxes. This approach provides an effective tool and guidance for experimentally designing new devices that induce strong directed migration of microscale swimmers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicMicro and Nano RoboticsFrench-language works237,207