MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2754514193 · doi:10.1002/slct.201701445

Microwave Irradiation of PC3 Cells at Constant Culture Temperature Alters the Incorporation of BODIPY into Cells and Reduction of MTT

2017· article· en· W2754514193 on OpenAlexafffund
Sina Atrin Mazinani, Fereshteh Moradi, Jeffrey A. Stuart, Hongbin Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistrySelect · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Inactivation Methods
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPropidium iodideAnnexinViability assayBromideMTT assayChemistryApoptosisMicrowaveIrradiationBiophysicsCell cultureMembraneMolecular biologyBiochemistryProgrammed cell deathBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The present study investigated the impact of 10 W microwave irradiation at 2.45 GHz on the cell viability and membrane properties of human prostate cancer PC3 cells, while the temperature of the cell cultures was maintained at 37±2 °C through simultaneous cooling. Microwave irradiation under these conditions did not induce apoptosis, nor otherwise lead to loss of cell viability, as indicated by 3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), Annexin–V, and propidium iodide assays. Interestingly however, incorporation of BODIPY (4,4‐difluoro‐5‐methyl‐4‐bora‐3a,4a‐diaza‐ s ‐indacene) 3‐dodecanoic acid into the cell membrane was facilitated by microwave treatment at constant temperature. Also, constant temperature microwave treatment significantly increased the rate of reduction of MTT. Taken together, these results suggest that constant temperature microwave, while non‐lethal to PC3 cells, may alter membrane properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistrySelectSame topicMicrobial Inactivation MethodsFrench-language works237,207