Clinical and Dermoscopic Features of Pigmented Disseminated Superficial Actinic Porokeratosis: Case Report and Literature Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Porokeratosis is a benign hyperkeratotic skin tumour due to a clonal proliferation of keratinocytes and is characterised by a telltale annular threadlike configuration along the border of a skin-colored to erythematous papule that can expand centrifugally. CASE PRESENTATION: We are presenting a clinical and dermoscopic case of pigmented disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis (DSAP) limited to the upper trunk of a white man with sun-damaged skin. Literature Review and Conclusion: A thorough review of PubMed failed to identify any previous reports on the dermoscopic appearance of pigmented porokeratosis. On dermoscopy, the presence of black dots limited to the periphery of the lesions is due to pigment incontinence and melanophages within the superficial papillary dermis limited to the area below the cornoid lamella. Pigmented DSAP is a unique morphological presentation of porokeratosis, and it is essential to be familiar with its clinical and dermoscopic presentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".