MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2754615637 · doi:10.1109/tie.2017.2752144

Dual-Rate Adaptive Control for Mixed Separation Thickening Process Using Compensation Signal Based Approach

2017· article· en· W2754615637 on OpenAlexaff
Linyan Wang, Yao Jia, Tianyou Chai, Wenfang Xie

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMinerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Arithmetic underflowController (irrigation)CascadeCompensation (psychology)PID controllerSlurryNonlinear systemAdaptive controlSIGNAL (programming language)EngineeringControl engineeringComputer sciencePhysicsTemperature controlEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mixed separation thickening process (MSTP) of hematite beneficiation is a strong nonlinear cascade process with frequency of slurry pump as input, underflow slurry flow-rate (USF) as inner-loop output, and underflow slurry density (USD) as outer-loop output. The model parameters such as settling velocity of slurry particles and slurry height are unknown and nonlinear. Moreover, these model parameters vary from flotation middling, sewage, and magnetic separation slurry. In this paper, the unknown change of the above dynamic characteristics are described by the previous sample unmodeled dynamics and its change rate. A novel adaptive controller using compensation signal based approach is developed. Inner-loop closed-loop control system equation and lifting technology are adopted to develop dual rate adaptive control method. Two compensation signals are constructed and added onto the linear proportional-integral (PI) controller. Such two compensation signals aim at eliminating the effects of the previous sample unmodeled dynamics and tracking error, respectively. The stability and convergence analysis is given and a simulation experiment on hardware-in-the-loop simulation system of MSTP based on industrial data is carried out, where it shows that the USD, USF, and its changing rate can be controlled well inside their targeted ranges when the system is subjected to unknown variations of its parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicMinerals Flotation and Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207