MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2754684107 · doi:10.1002/lno.10668

Photodissolution of copper from resuspended coastal marine sediments

2017· article· en· W2754684107 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Stephen A. Skrabal, Alyssa M. McBurney, Linda A. Webb, G. Brooks Avery, Robert J. Kieber, Ralph N. Mead

Bibliographic record

VenueLimnology and Oceanography · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of North Carolina WilmingtonCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBiogeochemical cycleSedimentEstuaryBenthic zoneEnvironmental chemistryWater columnOrganic matterCopperFlux (metallurgy)Dissolved organic carbonChemistrySeawaterMetalTotal organic carbonOceanographyEnvironmental scienceGeologyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Total dissolved Cu (TDCu) was photoproduced from suspensions of estuarine and coastal marine sediments from varied biogeochemical settings after exposure to the equivalent of 1 day of sunlight. Net photorelease (defined as the difference between mean light and dark concentrations) of TDCu occurred in 10 of 13 experiments and ranged from 1.1 nM to 11.8 nM (0.88–46.1 nmol Cu g −1 dry sediment). Photorelease was observed over environmentally relevant total suspended sediment concentrations ranging from 38 mg L −1 to 460 mg L −1 . The magnitude of photorelease was directly correlated to the 1 M HCl‐extractable Cu and Fe contents of sediments. Photoreleased Cu was likely associated with organic matter and/or Fe oxyhydroxides, both of which are photoreactive. Photoreleased TDCu persisted for at least 24 h after irradiation indicating that the Cu was not immediately scavenged back onto particles, most likely because it was stabilized by complexation with dissolved organic matter. Results of this study are important because a conservative estimate of the areal flux of TDCu from irradiation of a modest suspended sediment loading of 100 mg L −1 in the top 100 cm of a sunlit water column would be 460 nmol m −2 d −1 , which is comparable to or significantly larger than benthic and riverine fluxes of the metal in estuarine and coastal environments. These results suggest that photolytic fluxes are a significant yet previously unrecognized source of bioactive Cu to natural waters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLimnology and OceanographySame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207