MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2754748029 · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.12840

Phosphorylation of bacterial L9 and its functional implication in response to starvation stress

2017· letter· en· W2754748029 on OpenAlexafffund
Hairun Pei, Shengnan Han, Shaoyuan Yang, Zhen Lei, Jimin Zheng, Zongchao Jia

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersBeijing Technology and Business UniversityChinese Academy of SciencesInstitute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhosphorylationCTDCell biologyBiologyEscherichia coliChemistryBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The bacterial L9 (bL9) protein expressed and purified from Escherichia coli is stably phosphorylated. We mapped seven Ser/Thr phosphorylation sites, all of which but one are located at the carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD). When a histidine tag is fused to the C-terminus, bL9 is no longer phosphorylated. Phosphorylation of bL9 causes complete disordering of its CTD and helps cell survival under nutrient-limiting conditions. Previous structural studies of the ribosome have shown that bL9 exhibits two distinct conformations, one of which competes with binding of RelA to the 30s rRNA and prevents RelA activation. Taken together, we suggest that the flexibility of the bL9 CTD enabled by phosphorylation would remove the steric hindrance, serving as a previously unknown mechanism to regulate RelA function and help cell survival under starvation stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score0.862

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207