MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2755135385

LE MÊME ET L'AUTRE: À PROPOS D'UN ROMAN DE MARGUERITE DURAS

2017· article· fr· W2755135385 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J Terrasse

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Littératures | Université McGill · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Cultural and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtEthnologyHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'oeuvre de Marguerite Duras suscite depuis quelques annees une abondance de commentaires. Pascal Durand a denonce la demission de la critique devant la necessite de comprendre et analyser l'univers de l'ecrivain. Les etudes consacrees a Marguerite Duras apparaissent souvent comme un «ressassement», une repetition «quasi-litanique ou rituelle» preludant a une divinisation. Duras fait aujourd'hui l'objet d'un culte: une pretresse de ce culte l'a comparee a un Bouddha feminin. Le volume publie apres un sejour de l'ecrivain a Montreal offre plusieurs exemples de commentaires paraphrastiques qui temoignent de ce saut dans l'irrationnei. (...)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.034
Scholarly communication0.0120.007
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue Littératures | Université McGillSame topicDiverse Cultural and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207