MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2755285248 · doi:10.3917/amx.062.0026

« Regardez les allemands ! » : les racines de Lénine dans la social-démocratie européenne

2017· article· fr· W2755285248 on OpenAlexaff
Lars T. Lih, Paul Guillibert

Bibliographic record

VenueActuel Marx · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lars T. Lih, « Regardez les allemands ! » : les racines de Lénine dans la social-démocratie européenne À la fin du xix e siècle, le Parti social-démocrate allemand (SPD) propose un nouveau type de parti combinant des innovations techniques de mobilisations de masses (la campagne électorale, la « culture alternative », la presse de parti) avec un objectif révolutionnaire. Les sociaux-démocrates russes admiraient ce modèle, mais ils durent reconnaître qu’il leur manquait un point essentiel : la liberté politique nécessaire pour ce type de mobilisation. Ils durent innover pour adapter le modèle du SPD avec les conditions inhospitalières de la Russie. Dans ce cadre, Que faire ? de Lénine est moins une rupture théorique qu’un résumé d’une méthode empirique pensée avec les suggestions propres de Lénine pour atteindre cette étape, un parti national avec un leadership central.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.013
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActuel MarxSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207